Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Kaysville residents weigh in on tax increase
by LOUISE R. SHAW
May 07, 2014 | 1773 views | 2 2 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Kaysville City Council - Louise R. Shaw | Davis Clipper
Kaysville City Council - Louise R. Shaw | Davis Clipper
slideshow

KAYSVILLE -- Mayor Steve Hiatt pleaded with the audience at Tuesday's council meeting to dig into the details of the proposed city budget.

He asked them to go out and meet with people who work for the city, to learn more about the workers who go out to repair a burst pipe after a 12-hour shift plowing snow, and to review all the documents posted on the city's website in their effort to be transparent.

"We try to get as much information out to the public as we can," he said. "The vast majority aren't interested in being engaged in their community until it affects them or they read a headline."

Those headlines drew a crowd to Tuesday's meeting, some in protest and some in support of the city's proposed 102 percent tax increase.

After listening to almost two hours of comments on both sides of the issue, city council members defended their positions and explained the city's needs.

"Every single person around this table, we all want what's best for this city," said Jared Taylor, a council member. "We've been pleading for people to come over and learn more. We'll do anything we can to make this as open as possible."

A number of those who spoke had accused the council of being underhanded in the way they authorized the police station, of misleading the public, of overlooking the will of the people or of lacking integrity.

Some questioned the timing of the police station and that construction began before hearings on the budget took place. Several brought up the failed bond measure for a station in 2010. One called electric utility revenue a "slush fund" that the city drew on for other needs. 

"There's nobody hiding anything," said Brett Garlick, also a council member. He noted that when the police station was last discussed in a council meeting, a "huge majority" of those in attendance spoke in favor of it.

"We're listening to everybody," he said, but because there has only been one tax increase of 5 percent in 25 years, while cumulative retail rates have gone up 90 percent, he said, residents shouldn't expect services to remain the way they are without an increase. "Is it your street you don't want plowed? Is it your police call you don't want answered?"

The tentative budget was approved at the end of the comments Tuesday, and will now be available for review and discussion for 30 days. A public hearing is set for June 17 and a date for a Truth-in-Taxation hearing will be finalized after getting county approval on the date.

Council member Susan Lee was the lone vote against the tentative budget. She had proposed asking departments to cut their budgets 10 percent.

"My biggest concern are those that are on fixed incomes, or single family homes," she said. "This is a serious hit to their budget and if we're willing to ask them to feel that kind of pain, we should be able to do the same thing."

Several council members pointed out that firefighters and police officers were leaving the city for neighboring cities, whose wages were higher.

"We have to pay them competitive wages to have a fire department," said Mark Johnson, a council member.

Garlick said the city's police department had been considered a training ground in the past, and that officers, once trained, would leave for higher paying jobs.

"Now we're competitive," he said. "We've got a police force who want to be here."

Hiatt admitted that the large tax increase proposed by the city council is probably "political suicide," but added that the council was elected to make difficult decisions on behalf of city residents.

"We've heard a lot of good feedback," he said. "That's what the process was designed to do."

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
kcharles67
|
May 09, 2014
I disagree with the City Council, except for Susan Lee, that they are listening to everybody. It seems that they only listen to citizens who agree with their stance or opinion. To go behind the tax payers' backs to obtain a bond with a higher interest rate to fund the new police station is proof of that. If we as taxpayers need to adjust our priorities to be able to afford this increase to our property taxes, I would think that all of the departments in Kaysville City be made to feel the burden as well. Regarding the new police station, is it a necessity to have a weight room on site? I would be willing to pay for a membership to Sportsplex for any officer who would like one. In Ogden, the police and fire staffs regularly work out at Golds Gym. Why isn't that an option? It was brought up at the council meeting that there is basically nothing we can do regarding the property tax increase. While that may be true, we, as voting taxpayers, can vote out the current council, again with the exception of Susan Lee, and put in a council that is fiscally responsible and truly wants what is best for the city of Kaysville. I encourage everyone in Kaysville to start campaigning to elect a new city council. It's time that the citizens of Kaysville are actually heard.
Julio2
|
May 08, 2014
Margarate Brough and Kaysville Citizens for Responsible Government are responsible for 100% of the Kaysville City Property Tax increase.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of davisclipper.com
Follow us on: