Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Judge rules nudity not necessary in pornography on Duhamel case
by Clipper
Oct 09, 2006 | 93 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
SALT LAKE CITY -- A federal judge has ruled that nudity isn't necessary for photos of scantily clad children to be considered pornographic.

Matthew Duhamel of Bountiful and Charles Granere of Orem were arrested in March on child pornography charges relating to the operation of child modeling Web sites displaying what court documents allege are numerous sexually explicit depictions of young children.

According to those documents, one photo of a 9-year-old girl shows her dressed in "black stiletto pumps, a black lace thong, black bra and black jacket," sitting on a dining room table. The two men argued that the case against them should be dismissed because the children were not nude, and therefore could not be considered pornographic.

However, U.S. District Court Judge Tena Campbell rejected that argument on Friday, saying the law is clear in not requiring nudity under the definition of pornography.

She added that the determination of whether the images found on the Web site were pornographic should be made by a jury.

Campbell will issue a written ruling further outlining her decision.

mwilliams@davisclipper.com
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of davisclipper.com


Follow us on
Facebook and Twitter: